Archive for the ‘Economic’ Category

Malaysia’s economy — transcript of CNBC interview with Najib

September 11, 2010

KUALA LUMPUR(Bernama) – The following is a transcript of an interview by Martin Soong of CNBC Asia with Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak aired on Saturday.

CNBC: Let’s start first by talking about Malaysia’s economy, update us if you could. It started out the year 2010 very strongly, 10 per cent in excess of that growth first half. Second half though, fairly obviously things are going to have to slow down because of the external environment in the West is still looking fragile and Malaysia is still quite dependent on exports. Six per cent GDP growth this year, can Malaysia achieve it?

NAJIB: Yes, I believe we can achieve quite a robust growth this year. As you know, first quarter we achieved 10.1, second quarter 8.9. Going forward, second half, yes you are right, we expect growth to taper down. But there is enough momentum domestically, I think domestic demand, domestic consumption is high and I think it will continue to be relatively high this year. And external demand, although there will be some sort of dampening effect, but we do expect it to be fairly strong so we should end up with at least 6 per cent growth.CNBC:

At least 6 per cent growth?

NAJIB: Yes.

CNBC: This is what I find interesting, export growth is also decelerating as you would expect, as external demand slows down. The ringgit though, is trading at about the highest it has been in 13 years. Are you comfortable with the ringgit at these levels?

NAJIB: Yes we are, but we are monitoring it in terms of both our fiscal and monetary policy to make sure that the ringgit reflects the fundamentals of the economy and at the moment, we believe it does and the stronger ringgit doesn’t seem to have a negative impact on our exports.

CNBC: The ringgit is still not fully tradable offshore though and for several years already, one of the two key things foreign investors wanted to see happen, to see change in Malaysia, in order to make it more attractive for them to invest in the country was one; let’s see the ringgit tradable offshore again. Recently, Malaysia has made changes so the ringgit is a little bit more moveable on the capital account. In this kind of environment, economic environment, are any further changes on the ringgit? Do you foresee them?

NAJIB: We are monitoring the situation all the time, very closely. Most investors feel that this is not the key determinant in terms of their investment decisions. Most importantly, there is no restriction in terms of repatriation of dividends and profits, for example, and bringing in currency through the banking system. So it’s not really a major factor, but we are open to it. As you know, we are quite adaptive, and if we think that it’s going to help the economy, certainly we will review the situation.

CNBC: I’m gonna ask you another unfair question. But because you are the Prime Minister, I’m almost obliged to. We talked about the ringgit. Let’s talk about interest rates. In this kind of environment, will it slow down, what economist call “normalisation of rates”, that is, raising them.

NAJIB: This is basically the purview of the central bank, and I would like it to be in that context, but we do make adjustments, in terms of interest rates to make sure that the economy is not overheated, for example. Particularly, we don’t want a bubble, for example, but we want a steady robust growth.

CNBC: Let me ask you about Malaysia’s balance sheet. Debt is running at about 50 per cent of GDP, high but not worrisome and certainly manageable. Several of your own economists based here though had been warning that the situation cannot be allowed to continue lest down the road, 10, 15 years, Malaysia becomes another Greece. What is your priority in terms of reining in that deficit?

NAJIB: We have some options, in the short term and further down the road. For example, we have given this commitment to the market that will bring down our deficit to around 5.6 per cent of GDP this year. And I believe we are still on track. And we have also made an indication that by the end of the 10th (Malaysia) Plan, we hope to bring it down even further to say, around three per cent. There are various options available, one of which is of course to rein in expenditure, which we have done, we have cut back on development and on operating expenditure. So we have a few options, but going forward, I’m talking about maybe several years down the road, we have to look in terms of our tax base because Malaysia’s tax base is rather narrow with one per cent growth in GDP, our tax revenue only increases by about 0.8 per cent, or 0.85 per cent. So there is that limited elasticity in terms of tax returns. So some of the structural problems have to be addressed.

CNBC: We’ll return to some of these issues in just a bit. But in terms of fund raising, because of still lingering worries about the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, it has made it very difficult for a lot of other countries, which are in nowhere near as bad shape fiscally as many in Europe, to raise funds. It has made it more expensive for one thing. In Malaysia’s case?

NAJIB: In Malaysia’s case, not the case. We have global issue recently and it was oversubscribed and we have got good rates for it. I think the market has a positive view of Malaysia, provided we deliver with respect to our promises.

CNBC: Prime Minister, earlier on, you made reference to Malaysia’s latest five-year plan, this would be the 10th. One of the cornerstones of that is what a lot of economists are calling a rebalancing of our economy, to be less dependent on exports, more on domestic consumption and the local economy. How are things proceeding?

NAJIB: We have done our strategy, basically that is predicated on the new economic model and what is exciting about the new economic model is that we have identified where the new sources of growth are going to come from, including how do we resuscitate the domestic private economy, the private sector. The private sector has been taking a backstage vis-a-vis the public sector ever since the financial crisis of 1997. So we want the private sector to play a more dominant role. In fact, we have stated very clearly that to achieve our lofty targets, we have to raise 150 billion per year in terms of total investment. So that’s a huge undertaking. We have to address some of our concerns with respect to skills, for example. We must make sure we move up the value chain in terms of skills level, so we have to prime up the human capital development. We have to look at new sources of growth, and the growth can come from consumption, growth can come from demand, but growth can also come from innovation. If you want to get to 6 per cent, 7 per cent, then innovation will be the key enabler to achieve that.

CNBC: If the private sector is going to play a leading role in this, if services are going to play a leading role on this, one of the thoughts that struck me when I was doing a little bit of research on the controversy over when, how, how much to reduce subsidies, and therefore, help your fiscal position, the government’s fiscal position, is the company, corporate Malaysia has benefited predominantly from subsidies, not so much individuals, so if you remove the subsidies from them, will they become potentially less competitive? Would that hobble their ability to be a driver of growth for Malaysia to 2020?

NAJIB: I don’t think so. The message, the key message we are delivering to the private sector is that relying on subsidy gives you a false sense of being competitive. You must be competitive because you are more productive. You must be competitive because you are more innovative. You must be competitive because you made the right kind of investment. You have developed the right kind of talent. And those are the key factors, which will enable us to compete globally, not relying on subsidies because relying on subsidies gives you a false sense of security because the day of reckoning will come when subsidies will be removed eventually.

CNBC: So you are saying, force companies to become competitive.

NAJIB: Exactly, that’s what they have to do.

CNBC: At the same time though, a very fine balancing act and you referred to this earlier on, politically sensitive, because you do not want, you want to encourage the private sector to become more competitive, but you do not want to disadvantage the poor who probably need the subsidies a lot more.

NAJIB: Yes, that’s why part of our New Economic Model, we are focusing on not just eradicating not just absolute poverty, but we are looking at 40 per cent of the population, the more vulnerable group, the groups that are financially stressed at the end of each month and we have to do something for them, for these people. So when we remove subsidies gradually, we have to look in terms of increasing the income level. We have to look in terms of ensuring a wider social safety net, and so forth. So there are measures, which must be put into place. But where there has been a misallocation of resources, for example, people who own luxury cars should not enjoy subsidies. So those are in a way, reducing subsidies must also be a targeted way of doing it.

CNBC: Let’s pull back and look at your 18, coming to 19 months in office. Three months in, you already started making major changes, making Malaysia more open to foreign investment, foreign ownership, etc., fund management companies, 100 per cent foreign owned, that’s fine. There are still a number of people who look at the changes that you’ve made, or are trying to make, and are saying that is not enough. And they are voting with their feet. Your balance of payments in the 4th quarter, and the 3rd quarter, is negative, and it seems to be growing. How do you intend to stop this outflow of your talent as well as your money? Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, I think, was quoted saying not too long ago that there need to be fundamental changes otherwise Malaysia will continue to hemorrhage wealth as well as talent.

NAJIB: Well, there are some early positive indications. The 1st quarter this year, we are seeing more or less even in terms of the wealth flow. So that’s a good sign. Probably there is a greater sense of confidence, greater clarity in terms of the direction that the country is heading towards. There is also an attempt now to attract the Malaysia diaspora. I have announced the creation of a talent cooperation. In fact, we will make some important announcements shortly, with respect to the establishment of the talent cooperation and they would be going around and engaging Malaysians abroad, persuading them to return home. Secondly, we would have to look at the wage structure in Malaysia. I think we have undervalued human talent in Malaysia. I think human talent has been somewhat undervalued, so we do need to find a mechanism so that we can raise wage levels in Malaysia. Commensurate wage with their true value. And of course stressing on productivity. So these are some of the measures we will do.

CNBC: Prime Minister, since you’ve taken office one of the biggest initiatives has been to roll back more than 20 years of affirmative action, what used to be known as the New Economic Policy, NEP. The stock market in 18 months since you’ve been in power has been up about 60 per cent. That’s positive, it says something. At home though, I want to ask you, get your reaction to this, there are a number of your citizens, not just the Chinese and Indians, also the Malays who are very nervous about these changes. They are used to this status quo. The opposition is also skeptical, as you would probably expect. But even within the party that seems to be not total agreement. Then again we have got this right-wing splinter group from (former) Prime Minister Mahathir that has come up with Perkasa and they are attacking you from their front as well. How are you dealing with all of this?

NAJIB: Well, first of all, let me explain to you that we are still committed in terms of balancing the society, to get a more equitable society, which will lead to our long-term stability. What I am saying now is that what has worked in the past may not work today. So we are going to review the way we implement affirmative action, not the overall objective but the way we implement it, so that it would be seen to be fairer, should be more transparent, should be market-friendly. So the whole essence of the New Economic Model is not about changing the macro targets but to make sure that how we do it, ensures greater success. And by doing that, I think it would be more acceptable across the board. And it would be seen to be fairer as well. Obviously some people are concerned and maybe fear of change as well, but that’s nothing new. The other option is to remain status quo, to do business as usual. And we’ve looked at the numbers, we’ve looked at the statistics, that is not an option. If we don’t make changes, we don’t reform, Malaysia would slide backwards. We are convinced about that. Malaysia would lose our competitive edge and we are doing all this because we are committed to Vision 2020, which was started by Tun Mahathir Mohammad back in 1990. And we want to see that happen. We want to realise Vision 2020.

CNBC: Why is former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, and now Perkasa, why are they so upset though?

NAJIB: They are not against us. They are talking more about bumiputra rights. But actually we are not taking anything away from the bumiputra, but we are saying that let us do it differently. Let us get better results. Let us achieve a more equitable society. But at the same time, being fair to the non-bumiputras as well. Because we want to build a One Malaysia.

CNBC: Equity, fairness, redistribution of wealth. We’ve talked about some of the dissent within the party, the right-wing splinter group, Tun and Perkasa, the opposition. NGOs as well, civil society are saying one of the key elements that may be missing in your reform is Malaysian institution themselves, in terms of making them more efficient, less graft-proned, where there are, let’s say, perhaps, unintended misallocation of resources. Former Prime Minister (Abdullah Ahmad) Badawi, his big plan was fighting corruption. How’s that going? There doesn’t seem to be that much emphasis on it anymore or am I wrong?

NAJIB: No, this is very much a part of our national agenda because as you know, as part of our government transformation programme, reducing corruption is part of the 6 NKRAs, so it is a key result area, one of the key result areas, which we intend to do. So we are committed, we have strengthened MACC, but we need to produce, you know, more results, and more conviction, but it is a process, it is a journey, we are committed to it, we certainly will be focused about how we should go about it. We have also done other things like reducing government expenditure, most of our procurement now is based on open tender or restricted tender. There is less direct, very much reduced direct negotiation, so these are a broad range of measures we have instituted.

CNBC: Very quickly before we let you go. I want to talk to you about politics and elections. You have a window before elections need to be called again. There has been increasing attention on Sabah. Not a lot of people think about it or talk about it, in the foreign investment community. But in terms of votes, in terms of seats, that Sabah represents, it’s immensely important for the party. There has been increasing negativity and bad press to do with the way that Sabah has been left to run. What are you doing to address these issues ahead of polls? I mean here there are environmental concerns woven in as well.

NAJIB: Actually, if you see the resources we are going to allocate under 10th plan, especially with respect to the government transformation programme, quite a large chunk of our resources will be channelled into Sarawak and Sabah. You know, take for example infrastructure development, rural roads, electricity, water supply, the bulk of the resources will be spent in Sarawak and Sabah. And we are seeing results because I monitor this on a regular basis, so things are actually happening on the ground and we will see the achievements to be much higher as we move forward because we are gaining momentum. So our commitment is to actually bring a more equitable development, which includes Sabah and Sarawak because one of the cornerstones of our New Economic Model is to be inclusive.

CNBC: And very quickly before we let you go. After we’ve finished talking to you, one of the items of your agenda is you’ve been meeting with US President Barack Obama. What message will you have for him from Malaysia?

NAJIB: The message is that this is an important region and that the United States cannot afford not to have a serious policy toward Asia, a very serious engagement toward Asia, and that should manifest itself in many ways. First of all, taking Asean seriously, and also for us to be part of the wider regional architecture. For example, the trans-Pacific partnership, Malaysia is keen to be part of that because we think we can add value to it because we are a major trading nation, and America is very positive about Malaysia’s involvement in the trans-Pacific partnership and also not to mention the other areas of security, anti-terrorism and so forth. This is a key area and above all this is the area of growth, so on many fronts the relationship between United States and Asean is a very important relationship. – Bernama

Race politics hurting economic progress, says Chinese chamber

August 14, 2010

Yow Hong Chieh, Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 14 – Race politics is hampering the Najib administrations’s economic reforms under the New Economic Model, a Chinese chamber leader bluntly said today.

Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry Malaysia (ACCCIM) secretary-general Datuk David Chua said Malaysia needed to move away from race-based politics in order to move forward as a united nation.

“That (model) has taken us through the last 50 years. That’s fine, but I think it’s come to the point … where there is a need for some form of political transformation so that [Malaysian society] is not represented in silos.

“If that happens, I think there will be more commonality,” he said, adding tongue-in-cheek that the government should come up with a Political Transformation Programme (PTP) to this end.

“With that, we’ll be able to evolve towards a more united and better common understanding among various ethnic groups.”

Similar sentiments were expressed last month by Barisan Nasional veterans Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah and Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat.

Chua blamed “non-economic issues” for stalling the Najib administration’s ambitious economic reform plans, in what appeared to be an oblique reference to excessive communal politicking.

“There is a need to suspend or reorient certain… inhibiting policies,” he said.

“I think we are clouded with a lot of… issues that disturb the whole ambience of conducting business here.

“Every week, you have got something, some controversy… This is sapping a lot of our energy and I think we need to put a stop to that.”

He added that the nation’s “overriding objective” should instead be to ensure continued economic success.

Chua also criticised the government’s policy flip-flops for putting off potential investors.

“We need predictability… for strategic investment and business planning,” he said.

“Sometimes pronouncements are changed… so you get very confused signals.

“We need to institute a comprehensive plan of action… not merely piecemeal and ad hoc pronouncements.”

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has pledged to liberalise the economy but his credibility has been dented by his inability to trim bumiputera privileges to boost competitiveness.

Najib has repeatedly rolled back much needed pro-market reforms in the face of pressure from Malay rights groups such as Perkasa, who feel that the New Economic Model (NEM) represents an erosion of bumiputera special rights.

Click here to read more

Related Stories:
VIDEO PM: Chinese support vital for Malaysia
Nazir helps to knock down NEP, but can Najib push through NEM
By not questioning PM on the NEM, Chua may be abetting a lie
Najib panned for doublespeak at Chinese Economic Congress
IMF asks Malaysia to take ‘decisive’ action
How graft, racial-religious politicking killed Malaysia’s economy
Not only politicians but investors draw battle lines 
10th Malaysia Plan: Going forwards or backwards?
Najib launches stale economic plan, no sign of NEM

Cronies begin baying for the RM750mil raised from price hikes

July 18, 2010

Wong Choon Mei, Malaysia Chronicle

As Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim has warned, the Umno cronies and wolves have begun baying for the RM750 million being wrenched from Malaysian consumers, following a decision by Prime Minister Najib Razak to cut subsidies and raise prices of sugar, cooking gas, petrol, diesel and LPG.

Anwar has suggested the money is channeled back to the citizenry through educational projects and direct aid to low-income groups. “My advice is the money be used to increase funding for tertiary education institutions, new investments in education and direct welfare aid to low-income groups,” he said.

Meanwhile, others have suggested lowering personal income, tax rebates for targeted groups, and even new development projects to pump prime the economy. However, in the scheme of things, RM750 million is not an unduly large sum and cannot do that much.

Risk of the low-income sliding back into poverty

So perhaps, the Opposition Leader’s suggestion might be the most practical and the safest for the citizenry. In particular, some form of direct aid must be extended to the low-income groups because a lot more subsidy cuts are on the way, and that is for sure. Toll rates for the highways will be increased, electricity tariffs will be raised. Food and transport will go up. Even water prices may not be safe.

Without commensurate rises in wages, low-income Malaysians who are already struggling to survive may not survive the next round of hikes. It may knock them back into poverty and further social degradation.

Tax cuts and rebates while worthy of further thought should not be considered at this point because most of the lower-income groups do not pay tax in any case. So this won’t benefit them, but only the layers above them. Still, it won’t be long before the middle income feel the full-blown pinch and this is when ideas for tax cuts targeting individuals may come in handy.

Nevertheless, for this round, it is the bottom rung that will feel be hit the most because of the sharp price rises in sugar and cooking gas. Not only directly, but also indirectly, especially when the increases begin to work their way into prices of cooked food and public transportation.

Why isn’t there a coordinated and structured plan

According to HwangDBS Vickers Research analyst Chong Tjen-San, there are 19 highways scheduled for toll rate increases over the next 4 years. “If the government were to maintain toll rates at current levels, it would have to fork out RM3.19bil in subsidies over the next 4 years,” he said.

So, more increases on the way. That’s fine in the sense that it is only logical and right for the federal government to want to reduce subsidies and cut national debt. But why at such abrupt notice and so much hardship to the citizens, who will have to pay for whatever the government saves.

How come alternative solutions proposed by various experts, including opposition politicians, were not allowed to be publicly debated? For example, why are the toll firms left unscathed? Can the government not re-negotiate the concessions granted, and, why were the contracts so one-sided in the first place?

Indeed, the public feedback that Idris Jala – the minister tasked to steer the subsidy cuts – has said he would seek seems to have been publicized only to himself and his bosses, but not the rest of the country.

Cronies again?

Another research house OSK reckons that Tenaga Nasional, MMC and Gamuda may be the three most likely candidates to gain from this round of ‘government savings’. Or more more accurately, from the citizens’s hard-earned money because the RM750 million really comes from their pockets as they now have to pay more for their sugar, cooking gas, petrol, diesel and LPG.

Currently, national oil firm Petronas subsidizes the price of natural gas supplied to Independent Power Producers – to the tune of RM13.8 billion according to OSK. If Petronas stopped, the IPPs can retaliate by halting operations and removing 4,105 MW worth of electricity from the system and dropping reserve margins to as low as 13 per cent (considered a low level versus the more normal 20 to 30 percent buffer).

If this happened, Tenaga would have to raise electricity tariffs unless it expanded capacity. There is now speculation that the RM750 million could be used to expand the power plants of TNB and MMC at Janamanjung and Tanjung Bin. MMC is linked to tycoon Syed Mokhtar al-Bukhary, who himself has links to the Umno elite.

But what can RM750 million do – it is only enough to give Najib the opportunity to approve and kick-start the projects. After that, what? Will Malaysians be left in the lurch and stuck in yet another long drawn-out and disadvantageous agreement – just like the toll road concessions?

Same goes for Gamuda (yes, the home-grown construction giant linked to the Perak royal family). Again, the research firms are betting that Najib will channel the RM750 million into the new RM43 billion KL MRT project proposed by Gamuda and MMC.

With just RM750 million, and already the Najib administration is sounding out a RM43 billion project! Again, will Malaysians be left in the lurch and stuck in yet another long drawn-out and disadvantageous agreement – just like the toll road and the IPP concessions?


Waking up too late

Sadly, all trails lead to corruption – past and present. Malaysians have now got to face the fact they have been wearing rose-tinted glasses for the past five decades, especially during Mahathir era, when blinded by large-scale development, they did not question him or allowed him to be questioned.

But basically, whatever corrupt money that was reaped by the past governments has already left the country long ago. Those stuck with the baby are the Malaysian citizenry, the current administration and the companies that signed those contracts such as the toll road firms.

The Najib administration can re-negotiate with these toll road operators, but why would they wish to give up their profits without a fight? As possible as it was they might have in the past enticed officials in the Mahathir era into one-sided deals, perhaps they are now enticing officials in Najib administration to not rock the boat. After all, why change an existing agreement when the changes are not to their advantage?

So, left in the lurch is really the Malaysian people, who have to travel these roads every day whether in their own vehicles or in public transport, who have to buy those Proton cars even if the doors can’t open smoothly after just a week of getting them, or, who have to put up with expensive petrol when their own country is still an oil producer. The list just goes on.

It is not a new story but so shocking and sad is the plight of the average Malaysian that most of them still can’t believe the mess their country is in. There is no point in issuing wake up calls anymore. It is too late. The only medicine left for the economy is political – drastic political change and reform.

Also read:

Najibnomics: Price adjustments not hikes, rationalization not cuts

July 16, 2010

Wong Choon Mei, Malaysia Chronicle

Even before the Malaysian masses have digested the impact of a slew of price hikes, experts are already warning of more increases ahead , pointing out that Thursday’s ‘mild’ announcements were just a foretaste of the Najibnomics due to hit the country in the coming months.

“Malaysia will be facing a severe cash-flow squeeze very soon if it is not already experiencing this,” a research director at a large bank-backed brokerage told Malaysia Chronicle.

“There is not enough money to get projects moving and whatever is available is being channeled into areas that may not benefit the broader economy but just a small group of people. So they have to slash subsidies and we are looking at a series of cuts which will intensify three months from now at the latest. It is the fastest way for the authorities to raise cash.”

Adjustments not hike, rationalization not cuts

Indeed, Najib has been careful not to draw public anger. He increased by only 5sen per litre the price of RON95, an inferior grade that has now become the most popular because it is the most economical.

But that this was just a softener until the real increases roll in is apparent in the way his minders have warned the mainstream press to use terms like upward price adjustments instead of price hikes and subsidy rationalization process instead of subsidy cuts.

“It is very disappointing that these sort tactics are used in this day and age. He must have a very poor opinion about the rakyat’s intelligence. The worst is that he cannot even give a good justification for the price hikes,” PKR strategic director Tian Chua told Malaysia Chronicle.

“Basically, he has chosen to burden the people just to support his government’s lavish spending pattern. If RM750 million is the sum that he can raise from this exercise, don’t you think it is a waste of time. Why bother when he can splash RM7 billion on two faulty submarines and RM4 billion on the PM’s Department for this year alone?

Government spending spree despite subsidy cuts

Indeed, Tian may have hit bull-eyes. Rampant corruption has become so entrenched in Malaysia that it has seriously demoralized the citizenry. Few even bother to speak up when told of blatant wastage and leakage as a result of graft.

Nonetheless, when a minister, Nazri Azizi, said in response to a parliamentary query on Thursday that RM4 billion was set aside to run the PM’s Department in 2010 alone, a wave of anger was stirred.

Especially, when it was revealed that the costs included setting up an office for former premier Abdullah Badawi. It is believed that the costs also cover Abdullah’s entourage, as part of Najib’s succession negotiations when he took over the reins in April 2009.

“It is supposed to be just a department. But its annual allocation is 10 times more than Penang’s annual allocation from the federal government. Something is very, very wrong here,” said political analyst Khoo Kay Peng in his blog.

His words echoed those of Taiping MP, Nga Kor Ming, who had questioned Nazri about the budget for the PM’s offfice. Nga too pointed out that RM4billion was at least 5 times the annual spending of the Perak state government.

Vicious cycle

Among financial firms that have published their preliminary analysis of the latest hikes is government-linked MIDF, and even it expects another increase in petrol prices soon, although its forecast might be a tad too conservative.

“We expect fuel price to rise again, most probably in the first half of 2011, with another five sen increase,” it said in its morning report.

Others were less polite. They tore into other data provided by Nazri that confirmed a sharp rise in staff count in the PM’s office from 21,045 in 2003 to 43,544 in 2010.

“That is just the PM’s Department. What about the rest of the civil service? Malaysia has the most bloated civil service compared to its population in Southeast Asia. And the reasons are political. In return for their jobs, government servants are expected to vote Umno and BN,” PAS treasurer-general Dr Hatta Ramli told Malaysia Chronicle.

“But the problem is the reason for Umno to maintain this policy is more than just political. It is a vicious cycle. To stay in power, they have to borrow in the name of the country to maintain this huge population of civil servants. And when they stay in power, they continue their program of patronage and this is the source of the corruption that has overtaken our system and is keeping foreign investors away.”

Who’s telling the truth

Apart from the five sen price increase for RON95 and diesel respectively, the government also put the higher-grade RON97 on a managed float that will be subjected to price changes in the market.

LPG rose 10 sen to RM1.85 per kg, while sugar was also raised by 25sen to RM1.75 per kg. Cooking gas was also hiked by RM1 to RM18.50 for the 10kg cylinder, by RM1.20 to RM22.20 for the 12kg cylinder and by RM1.40 to RM25.90 for the 14kg cylinder

“Can RON95 can stay at RM1.85 and will subsequent hikes will be as gentle as the government has promised?” a chief economist at a local bank told Malaysia Chronicle.

“Just look at RON97 and you will know who is telling the truth. If there is a huge upswing in the global oil market, the price of RON97 will have to jump sharply because it now tracks market movements. If that happens, how can RON95 stay unchanged or be changed by just a minute degree?”